Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AT-3.6: Schedule an automatic audit #223

Closed
Amanda-Kolopa opened this issue Jan 26, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

AT-3.6: Schedule an automatic audit #223

Amanda-Kolopa opened this issue Jan 26, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
acceptance-test Functional review based on PO signature
Milestone

Comments

@Amanda-Kolopa
Copy link
Contributor

Test Case ID: AT-3.6

User Story: ALTA-3.6 (#54)

As an inventory manager, I want to be able to schedule automatic audits at a specified frequency so that I can routinely reinitiate audits.

Acceptance Criteria

Given that the user is logged in as an inventory manager,

  1. The user should be redirected to the Dashboard page.
  2. The user selects the Template side menu option.
  3. The user is presented with the organization's predefined templates (if any) and an Add button.
  4. The user selects the Add button.
  5. The user is presented with an empty form containing the template's input fields and scheduling sub-section.
  6. The user inputs the template information and schedules the audit's start date, start time, recurrence, and time zone.
  7. The user selects the Save button.
  8. The user is redirected back to the Templates page to confirm the template creation.
@Amanda-Kolopa Amanda-Kolopa added the acceptance-test Functional review based on PO signature label Jan 26, 2021
@Amanda-Kolopa Amanda-Kolopa added this to the Sprint 6 milestone Jan 26, 2021
@ajaykaushik17
Copy link

ACCEPTED
Note: need to make sure assignment of stock keepers for scheduled/automatic audits is aligned with their availability.
OR defaulted to some specific stock keepers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
acceptance-test Functional review based on PO signature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants