This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 25, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 67
Add predicate support #886
Comments
|
|
In this case, it would be filtering predicate inputs by the owner address. Here's the overall flow that I'm picturing, given that we want to have handlers for specific witnesses and coin owners:
Witness validation procedure:
Here's an example of what I'm thinking this standardized witness format could be to enable validation:
|
This was referenced Sep 21, 2023
7 tasks
ra0x3
changed the title
Create standard for using
Add predicate support
Oct 6, 2023
Witness
data to filter Transaction
s
Here's a more concrete description of how this could work, broken down step by step. There's definitely some lower-level details I'm missing but this should give a rough sketch of the general usage & flow. User flow: Opening and fulfilling a market orderSetup:
User A opens a position to buy eth:
User B fulfills market order by selling eth
|
Hi guys, I am happy to participate in this discussion in any case, if you need any help tag me 🫡 |
Temporarily blocked by release of fuels 0.50 |
ra0x3
added
big
breaking
This is a change that will break some component of the project once merged to origin/develop
labels
Nov 20, 2023
This was referenced Dec 4, 2023
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
log
#881 we need to create a standard for includingWitness
data in aTransaction
- where thisWitness
data can be filtered on aTransaction
level downstreamThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: