You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If the block producer receives the whole fee from transactions included in the block, he can generate many transactions, increasing gas/storage prices and receiving spent tokens back. It allows him price manipulations for free, making the transition very expensive for the end-user.
Maybe we want to consider something like eip-1559, but instead of burning base fee tokens, we could distribute them between fuel token holders.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This concern seems more applicable in a decentralized sequencing model, as a single sequencer chain can affect prices in a multitude of more straightforward ways (i.e. adjusting the min-price parameter at the mempool level) in order to cover expenses (i.e. DA upload or node hosting costs).
If the block producer receives the whole fee from transactions included in the block, he can generate many transactions, increasing gas/storage prices and receiving spent tokens back. It allows him price manipulations for free, making the transition very expensive for the end-user.
Maybe we want to consider something like eip-1559, but instead of burning base fee tokens, we could distribute them between fuel token holders.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: