We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
During some load tests, we realized a couple of issues (#3279, #3277) that we're fixing and optimizing.
In keeping with this theme, we should continue the effort and review our predefined GQL queries and fragments.
Every field removal is a breaking change and can break things for apps, so we need to be extra careful here.
Taking from the providers/operations.graphql:
providers/operations.graphql
getTransaction
getTransactionWithReceipts
getTransactions
getTransactionsByOwner
getRelayedTransactionStatus
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@Torres-ssf do you think this can be closed as part of #3336? I can't see any further optimizations.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Closing this issue as the optimizations have already been addressed through the following closed PRs:
blockId
Torres-ssf
No branches or pull requests
During some load tests, we realized a couple of issues (#3279, #3277) that we're fixing and optimizing.
In keeping with this theme, we should continue the effort and review our predefined GQL queries and fragments.
Every field removal is a breaking change and can break things for apps, so we need to be extra careful here.
Taking from the
providers/operations.graphql
:getTransaction
getTransactionWithReceipts
getTransactions
getTransactionsByOwner
getRelayedTransactionStatus
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: