refactor: rename dstChain to chain #595
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes primarily focus on renaming parameters in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant CrossChainContract
participant EventHandler
User->>CrossChainContract: ExecuteClaim(_chain, _eventNonce)
CrossChainContract->>EventHandler: NewExecuteClaimEvent(sender, _eventNonce, _chain)
EventHandler-->>CrossChainContract: Event Recorded
CrossChainContract-->>User: Claim Executed
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (7)
- contract/ICrossChain.go (5 hunks)
- solidity/contracts/bridge/ICrossChain.sol (2 hunks)
- tests/contract/CrossChainTest.go (1 hunks)
- tests/crosschain_suite.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/precompile/execute_claim.go (3 hunks)
- x/crosschain/precompile/execute_claim_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/types/contract.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- solidity/contracts/bridge/ICrossChain.sol
Additional comments not posted (12)
x/crosschain/precompile/execute_claim_test.go (2)
18-21: LGTM! Renaming improves clarity and consistency.The changes to rename
_dstChainIdto_chainin the method and event strings are appropriate and improve the clarity and consistency of the code.
28-28: LGTM! Renaming improves clarity and consistency.The changes to rename
DstChaintoChainin theExecuteClaimArgsstruct are appropriate and improve the clarity and consistency of the code.x/crosschain/precompile/execute_claim.go (3)
Line range hint
55-64:
LGTM! Renaming improves clarity and consistency.The changes to rename
args.DstChaintoargs.Chainin theGetRouteandNewExecuteClaimEventmethod calls are appropriate and improve the clarity and consistency of the code.
64-64: LGTM! Renaming improves clarity and consistency.The changes to rename
args.DstChaintoargs.Chainin theNewExecuteClaimEventmethod call are appropriate and improve the clarity and consistency of the code.
88-88: LGTM! Renaming improves clarity and consistency.The changes to rename
args.DstChaintoargs.Chainin thePackInputmethod are appropriate and improve the clarity and consistency of the code.x/crosschain/types/contract.go (1)
188-193: LGTM! Renaming improves clarity and consistency.The changes to rename
DstChaintoChainin theExecuteClaimArgsstruct and updating theabitag are appropriate and improve the clarity and consistency of the code.tests/contract/CrossChainTest.go (1)
35-35: Verify the correctness of the updated binary data.The binary data for the contract has been updated. Ensure that the new implementation behaves as intended and does not introduce any unintended consequences.
tests/crosschain_suite.go (1)
705-707: Verify the correctness of the renamed field.The
DstChainfield has been renamed toChain. Ensure that the new field name is used consistently throughout the codebase and does not introduce any unintended consequences.Verification successful
Verify the consistent renaming of the
DstChainfield toChaininExecuteClaimArgs.The
DstChainfield has been renamed toChain. Ensure that the new field name is used consistently throughout the codebase and does not introduce any unintended consequences.
Verify the consistent renaming of the
DstChainfield toChaininExecuteClaimArgs.The
DstChainfield has been renamed toChain. Ensure that the new field name is used consistently throughout the codebase and does not introduce any unintended consequences.
The renaming of the
DstChainfield toChaininExecuteClaimArgsis consistent and correct.The
DstChainfield has been successfully renamed toChainin theExecuteClaimArgsstruct and its usages across the codebase. No inconsistencies or issues were found.
x/crosschain/types/contract.go: Definition ofExecuteClaimArgswithChainfield.x/crosschain/precompile/execute_claim_test.go: Usage ofExecuteClaimArgswithChainfield.x/crosschain/precompile/execute_claim.go: Usage ofExecuteClaimArgswithChainfield.tests/crosschain_suite.go: Usage ofExecuteClaimArgswithChainfield.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the renamed field. # Test: Search for the old and new field names. Expect: No occurrences of the old field name and consistent usage of the new field name. rg --type go 'DstChain' rg --type go 'Chain'Length of output: 324497
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the consistent renaming of the `DstChain` field to `Chain` in `ExecuteClaimArgs`. # Search for the definition of `ExecuteClaimArgs` and its usage to ensure the field renaming is consistent. rg --type go 'type ExecuteClaimArgs struct' rg --type go 'ExecuteClaimArgs'Length of output: 876
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the definition of `ExecuteClaimArgs` and its usages to verify the field renaming. # Extract the definition of `ExecuteClaimArgs` struct. rg --type go -A 10 'type ExecuteClaimArgs struct' x/crosschain/types/contract.go # Extract the usages of `ExecuteClaimArgs` to verify the field renaming. rg --type go -A 5 'ExecuteClaimArgs' x/crosschain/precompile/execute_claim_test.go x/crosschain/precompile/execute_claim.go tests/crosschain_suite.goLength of output: 2727
contract/ICrossChain.go (4)
1230-1230: LGTM!The field name change from
DstChaintoChainin theICrossChainExecuteClaimEventstruct improves clarity and consistency.
321-323: LGTM!The parameter name change from
_dstChainIdto_chainin theExecuteClaimfunction improves clarity and consistency.
328-330: LGTM!The parameter name change from
_dstChainIdto_chainin theExecuteClaimfunction improves clarity and consistency.
335-337: LGTM!The parameter name change from
_dstChainIdto_chainin theExecuteClaimfunction improves clarity and consistency.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
ExecuteClaimfunction and associated events to enhance clarity and consistency.Bug Fixes
_dstChainIdto_chain, aligning with clearer terminology across the codebase.Tests