Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: update change log #625

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 5, 2024
Merged

chore: update change log #625

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 5, 2024

Conversation

zakir-code
Copy link
Contributor

@zakir-code zakir-code commented Aug 5, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Resolved an issue with "nil consensus params" to enhance the reliability of the migration process.
    • Addressed compatibility issues related to deprecated proposals and historical data to improve system performance.
  • Documentation

    • Updated the CHANGELOG.md to include significant changes and fixes for version v7.4.0-rc6, providing clearer context for users.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 5, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent update in version v7.4.0-rc6 enhances the blockchain system by addressing a critical issue related to "nil consensus params" in the BeginBlock function during migration. This fix aims to improve the reliability and integrity of block generation, ensuring a smoother transition between versions. The previous version, v7.4.0-rc5, focused on resolving deprecated proposal compatibility, highlighting ongoing efforts to refine functionality and enhance system performance.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
CHANGELOG.md Added details for v7.4.0-rc6 addressing "nil consensus params" in BeginBlock function during migration; noted v7.4.0-rc5 fix for deprecated proposals.

Poem

🐇 In the code where rabbits hop,
A change to make the system stop,
With consensus fixed, we leap with glee,
Our blocks now dance—oh, joyful spree!
Migration smooth, as smooth can be,
Hopping forward—come join me! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between de4d336 and 8bbbe51.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
CHANGELOG.md (5)

3-3: New section for version v7.4.0-rc6 added.

The new section header is correctly formatted.


4-4: Consistent formatting with a blank line.

The blank line after the section header is consistent with the formatting used in other sections.


5-5: Documented fix for "nil consensus params" in BeginBlock during migration.

The description is clear and concise, accurately reflecting the fix.


6-6: Consistent formatting with a blank line.

The blank line after the fix description is consistent with the formatting used in other sections.


7-7: Consistent formatting with a horizontal rule.

The horizontal rule to separate sections is consistent with the formatting used in other sections.

@fx0x55 fx0x55 merged commit aed781c into main Aug 5, 2024
2 checks passed
@fx0x55 fx0x55 deleted the nulnut/changelog branch August 5, 2024 10:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants