test: fix staking precompile v2 test

[zakir-code]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes

  • Improved the clarity and structure of staking tests for better accuracy in verifying staking operations.

• Refactor

  • Streamlined logging in test functions to enhance readability and performance during execution.
  • Simplified delegation calculations within the staking tests for clearer understanding and consistency.

• Tests

  • Added assertions to validate expected outcomes during delegation and undelegation processes.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The recent changes streamline test functions in the integration suite by removing unnecessary logging and enhancing code clarity. In BridgeCallTest, excessive internal state logs were eliminated, improving readability. The StakingPrecompileV2 test saw a simplification of delegation logic, with clearer variable usage and additional assertions to verify outcomes. These updates maintain core functionality while making the tests more efficient and understandable.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
tests/crosschain_test.go	Removed logging statements from BridgeCallTest to enhance readability and performance, preserving core functionality.
tests/staking_test.go	Simplified delegation logic in StakingPrecompileV2, clarified undelegation steps, and added assertions to verify outcomes.

Poem

🐇 In the code where bunnies hop,
Tests grew clearer, no need to stop.
Logs were trimmed, logic refined,
Staking flows now more aligned.
Hopping through functions with glee,
Cleaner tests, oh joy to see! 🌟

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9bf195a and c41bb04.

Files selected for processing (2)

• tests/crosschain_test.go (1 hunks)
• tests/staking_test.go (2 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• tests/crosschain_test.go

Additional comments not posted (7)

tests/staking_test.go (7)

537-537: Enhance readability with step comments.

The numbered comment improves the readability and understanding of the test flow by clearly outlining the steps.

---

542-544: Simplify initial delegation amount.

The change to use a plain integer for delBalance instead of multiplying by a scaling factor simplifies the calculations and improves clarity.

---

556-557: Introduce halfDelegateAmount for clarity.

The introduction of halfDelegateAmount clarifies the intention behind the undelegation operation, making the code more understandable.

---

558-561: Clarify undelegation logic.

The explicit calculation of half of the delBalance and its use in UnDelegateV2 enhances clarity and reduces potential errors.

---

563-569: Clarify redelegation process.

The steps for creating a new validator and redelegating to it are clearly outlined, improving the readability and understanding of the test logic.

---

575-577: Verify delegation amount for new validator.

The check for the new validator's delegation amount ensures that the redelegation logic is correctly implemented.

---

579-584: Finalize test with cleanup.

The final block ensures that the new validator is cleared, maintaining test integrity and preventing side effects.