You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
I'm encountering a casting error when integrating ExponentialDecayPermeability, suggesting an unexpected type mismatch with ConstantPermeability. The error occurs not due to solver choice but seems related to how ExponentialDecayPermeability is integrated and recognized within the framework. I have used the following example from GEOSX documentation:
https://geosx-geosx.readthedocs-hosted.com/en/docs-jhuang-updatehfexamples/docs/sphinx/advancedExamples/validationStudies/faultMechanics/faultVerification/Example.html
Just changed the permeability type from Constant permeability to ExponentialDecayPermeability
***** ERROR
***** LOCATION: /home1/alqadran/geostest/GEOS/src/coreComponents/common/DataTypes.hpp:100
***** Controlling expression (should be false): ptr == nullptr
***** Rank 0: Cast from geos::constitutive::ExponentialDecayPermeability to geos::constitutive::ConstantPermeability failed.
Has anyone faced a similar issue or can offer guidance on correctly configuring ExponentialDecayPermeability for use in poromechanics simulations?
Thanks
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions