-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
Improving data coverage #27
Comments
@IanLee1521 have y'all look into collecting the user/organizations for US federal agencies? A few special cases
|
Hi @Nosferican -- I haven't specifically, but mostly because there is already https://government.github.com/community/ which has that data. I did run github.com/llnl/scraper against the U.S. entries on that site (at the time) and posted those results on the pull request: LLNL/scraper#3 Is that what you were thinking, or something else? |
The GitHub Government Community collection is a crowd-sourced initiative, but it isn't curated per se... For example, you have some organizations that are definitely not U.S. Federal dept/agencies (e.g., For obtaining a list of U.S. federal dept/agencies and other entities we were thinking of using A-Z Index of U.S. Government Departments and Agencies which has a directory based on the U.S. Government Manual supplemented with entities that "directly serve the public" (e.g., USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service NASS). Ideally M-16-21 should have the dept/agency heads report monitor it, but I suspect it isn't occurring as diligently as it could be. That proposal seems like the best approach considering the lack of access to an exhaustive list of (at least public) U.S. federal dept/agencies and the different organizational levels. For example,
It is unclear at what levels would a GitHub organization be set up. It is unclear which levels would show up in budget / organizational databases. Some of the heuristics we might use are to require the GitHub organization to have listed a website with a |
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: