Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test with a non fatal stacktrace #15

Open
Galigator opened this issue Mar 22, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Test with a non fatal stacktrace #15

Galigator opened this issue Mar 22, 2017 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Developper confirm there is a bug in the product.

Comments

@Galigator
Copy link
Owner

Serious investigation need, to see if this log must be shutdown or a correction must be done.

2017-03-21 23:19:59 SEVERE openllet.test.query.ManifestEngine doEvaluationTest Ignoring triple with unknown property from OWL namespace: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/guide-src/food#Moderate @owl:sameIndividualAs http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/guide-src/wine#Moderate
openllet.core.exceptions.UnsupportedFeatureException: Ignoring triple with unknown property from OWL namespace: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/guide-src/food#Moderate @owl:sameIndividualAs http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/guide-src/wine#Moderate
at openllet.jena.graph.loader.DefaultGraphLoader.addUnsupportedFeature(DefaultGraphLoader.java:224)
at openllet.jena.graph.loader.DefaultGraphLoader.processTriple(DefaultGraphLoader.java:1545)
at openllet.jena.graph.loader.DefaultGraphLoader.processTriples(DefaultGraphLoader.java:1461)
at openllet.jena.graph.loader.DefaultGraphLoader.processTriples(DefaultGraphLoader.java:1444)
at openllet.jena.graph.loader.DefaultGraphLoader.load(DefaultGraphLoader.java:2076)
at openllet.jena.PelletInfGraph.load(PelletInfGraph.java:239)
at openllet.jena.PelletInfGraph.load(PelletInfGraph.java:209)
at openllet.jena.PelletInfGraph.prepare(PelletInfGraph.java:262)
at openllet.jena.PelletInfGraph.prepare(PelletInfGraph.java:251)
at org.apache.jena.ontology.impl.OntModelImpl.prepare(OntModelImpl.java:2690)
at openllet.test.query.PelletSparqlDawgTester.createDataset(PelletSparqlDawgTester.java:130)
at openllet.test.query.PelletSparqlDawgTester.createQueryExecution(PelletSparqlDawgTester.java:152)
at openllet.test.query.ARQSparqlDawgTester.isCorrectlyEvaluated(ARQSparqlDawgTester.java:171)
at openllet.test.query.ManifestEngine.doEvaluationTest(ManifestEngine.java:387)
at openllet.test.query.ManifestEngine.doTestCase(ManifestEngine.java:423)
at openllet.test.query.ManifestEngine.doSingleTest(ManifestEngine.java:287)
at openllet.test.query.SparqlDawgTestCase.runTest(SparqlDawgTestCase.java:59)
at openllet.test.query.SparqlDawgTestSuite.run(SparqlDawgTestSuite.java:152)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor25.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:50)
at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:128)
at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:27)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:128)
at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:27)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:128)
at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:27)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:367)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:274)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:238)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:161)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:290)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:242)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:121)

@Galigator Galigator added the bug Developper confirm there is a bug in the product. label Mar 22, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Developper confirm there is a bug in the product.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant