Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[POC] : Used case of blockwise for CNES QI team #598

Open
2 tasks
adebardo opened this issue Oct 3, 2024 · 2 comments
Open
2 tasks

[POC] : Used case of blockwise for CNES QI team #598

adebardo opened this issue Oct 3, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
[POC] Conception stuck The issue conception is stopped

Comments

@adebardo
Copy link

adebardo commented Oct 3, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Context

Currently, xdem allows for tile-based coregistration of DEMs, which overlaps with the latest POC implemented in demcompare. The goal of this ticket is to verify if xdem can meet our specific needs.

Implementation

  • Run xdem on a small test case and compare the results with demcompare.
  • Set up a notebook to document the process, saving it in a folder dedicated to tiling.
@adebardo adebardo added the [POC] TODO Ready for developpment label Oct 3, 2024
@rhugonnet
Copy link
Contributor

In case it's relevant: blockwise has a problem right now, see #584

@adebardo adebardo added [POC] Conception stuck The issue conception is stopped and removed [POC] TODO Ready for developpment labels Oct 4, 2024
@adebardo
Copy link
Author

adebardo commented Oct 4, 2024

@rhugonnet thanks for your reply, we will add this to our study

@adebardo adebardo changed the title [POC] : cas d'études blockwise [POC] : Used case of blockwise for CNES QI team Oct 14, 2024
@rhugonnet rhugonnet mentioned this issue Nov 5, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
[POC] Conception stuck The issue conception is stopped
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@rhugonnet @adebardo