Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

result is higher from paper on cpu? #3

Open
intellectwood opened this issue Jul 10, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

result is higher from paper on cpu? #3

intellectwood opened this issue Jul 10, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@intellectwood
Copy link

I just follow the readme to perform one experiment on cpu:
python train.py --method EDGNN --dname senate-committees-100 --All_num_layers 8 --MLP_num_layers 2 --MLP2_num_layers 2
--MLP3_num_layers 2 --Classifier_num_layers 2 --MLP_hidden 512 --Classifier_hidden 256 --aggregate mean
--restart_alpha 0.5 --lr 0.001 --wd 0 --epochs 500 --runs 10 --feature_noise 1.0
--data_dir <data_path> --raw_data_dir <raw_data_path>

It returns the results:
Highest Train: 100.00 ± 0.00
Highest Valid: 77.29 ± 4.18
Final Train: 97.16 ± 2.36
Final Test: 68.73 ± 3.56

my question is why it is much higher than the value 64.79 ± 5.14 from paper?
though I did do it on GPU but it differ a lot, anything I miss?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant