You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for this awesome tool! Is it possible to output a bam that does not have the split and discordant reads if specifying -d and -s with samblaster? Thanks again!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We'd like to add read groups for clipped, split, discordant, or properly-paired unsplit not-overly-clipped mappings in order to tabulate base modifications. Excluding discordant from the "main" properly-paired not-overly-clipped mappings is easy enough. Excluding clipped reads appears to mean using a perl script but does not appear to be a showstopper. Excluding split reads is something of a showstopper unless we reach in and heavily modify Samblaster itself. I imagine this would be a more straightforward task for someone who is exceedingly familiar with Samblaster.
It looks like the commented block starting around line 350 in samblaster.cpp touches on this -- is there a timeline for read-grouping and/or UMI support? Read grouping (split/disc/clipped/otherwise-OK) appears to be on the todo list for others as well.
Thank you for this awesome tool! Is it possible to output a bam that does not have the split and discordant reads if specifying
-d
and-s
with samblaster? Thanks again!The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: