Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci(coderabbit): enable auto review #219

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2024

Conversation

zyy17
Copy link
Collaborator

@zyy17 zyy17 commented Nov 20, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Automatic review functionality is now enabled, streamlining the review process.
    • Drafts can now be included in the automatic review process, enhancing workflow efficiency.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 20, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes made in the pull request involve modifications to the .coderabbit.yaml configuration file. Specifically, the auto_review section has been updated to enable automatic review functionality by setting the enabled attribute to true. Additionally, the drafts attribute has been changed to true, which allows drafts to be included in the automatic review process. No other modifications were made to the file.

Changes

File Change Summary
.coderabbit.yaml Updated auto_review.enabled from false to true and auto_review.drafts from false to true.

Poem

In the garden of code, a change takes flight,
Auto reviews now dance in the light.
Drafts join the party, a hop and a cheer,
Configs are spruced up, the future is near!
With a flick of the tail, let the reviews begin,
A rabbit's delight, where the fun's never thin! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.coderabbit.yaml (1)

20-20: Consider excluding draft PRs from auto review.

While enabling auto review for draft PRs can provide early feedback, it might consume unnecessary resources on incomplete work. Consider keeping drafts: false until the PR is ready for review, as draft PRs are typically work in progress and may undergo significant changes.

  auto_review:
    enabled: true
-   drafts: true
+   drafts: false
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 76d8f13 and 996a628.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.coderabbit.yaml (1)

19-19: LGTM! Enabling auto review will streamline the review process.

The change to enable automatic code reviews aligns with the PR objective and will help maintain consistent code quality across all pull requests.

@zyy17 zyy17 merged commit aec1fc8 into GreptimeTeam:main Nov 20, 2024
5 checks passed
@zyy17 zyy17 deleted the ci/configure-coderabbit2 branch November 20, 2024 06:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants