Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MoreKnockback #1780

Open
Dbbtop opened this issue Nov 9, 2024 · 22 comments
Open

MoreKnockback #1780

Dbbtop opened this issue Nov 9, 2024 · 22 comments
Labels

Comments

@Dbbtop
Copy link

Dbbtop commented Nov 9, 2024

Describe the bypass and how to replicate it

@eventhandler
public void onSendPacket(PacketEvent.Send event) {
if ((!MovementUtility.isMoving() || inMove.getValue())
&& event.getPacket() instanceof PlayerInteractEntityC2SPacket
&& getInteractType(event.getPacket()) == Criticals.InteractType.ATTACK
&& !(getEntity(event.getPacket()) instanceof EndCrystalEntity)
&& getEntity(event.getPacket()) instanceof LivingEntity lent
&& lent.hurtTime <= hurtTime.getValue()
&& MathUtility.random(0, 100) >= (100 - chance.getValue())
&& !canCrit()) {

        if (mc.player.isSprinting()) sendPacket(new ClientCommandC2SPacket(mc.player, ClientCommandC2SPacket.Mode.STOP_SPRINTING));
        sendPacket(new ClientCommandC2SPacket(mc.player, ClientCommandC2SPacket.Mode.START_SPRINTING));
        sendPacket(new ClientCommandC2SPacket(mc.player, ClientCommandC2SPacket.Mode.STOP_SPRINTING));
        sendPacket(new ClientCommandC2SPacket(mc.player, ClientCommandC2SPacket.Mode.START_SPRINTING));
        debug("wtap");
        mc.player.setSprinting(true);
        mc.player.lastSprinting = true;

Grim version

latest

Server version

1.19.4

Plugins

grim, packetevents, LP

@Dbbtop Dbbtop added the bypass label Nov 9, 2024
@ManInMyVan
Copy link
Contributor

patched by #1678

@Dbbtop
Copy link
Author

Dbbtop commented Nov 10, 2024

patched by #1678

i just tested it, and nah

@ManInMyVan
Copy link
Contributor

patched by #1678

i just tested it, and nah

did you put "PacketOrder" in your punishments.yml?

@Dbbtop
Copy link
Author

Dbbtop commented Nov 10, 2024

patched by #1678

i just tested it, and nah

did you put "PacketOrder" in your punishments.yml?

Yes

@ManInMyVan
Copy link
Contributor

patched by #1678

i just tested it, and nah

did you put "PacketOrder" in your punishments.yml?

Yes

did you enable experimental checks?

@Dbbtop
Copy link
Author

Dbbtop commented Nov 10, 2024

Yes

@ManInMyVan
Copy link
Contributor

did you enable verbose?

@Dbbtop
Copy link
Author

Dbbtop commented Nov 11, 2024

Yes

@ManInMyVan
Copy link
Contributor

@Dbbtop
Copy link
Author

Dbbtop commented Nov 11, 2024

@Dbbtop
Copy link
Author

Dbbtop commented Nov 11, 2024

@SuicidalEeper
Copy link

The code you provided above is only supposed to actually run when you're sprinting though no?

@Dbbtop
Copy link
Author

Dbbtop commented Nov 11, 2024

this function sends a sprint packet to make a pushback attack even without movement

@ManInMyVan
Copy link
Contributor

this function sends a sprint packet to make a pushback attack even without movement

it doesn't look like you have that enabled

@ManInMyVan
Copy link
Contributor

this function sends a sprint packet to make a pushback attack even without movement

I'm not checking stationary players on 1.9+ because of tick skipping

@Axionize
Copy link
Contributor

Axionize commented Nov 24, 2024

As far as I can tell this is literally just an auto w-tap that only works when you're standing still. When would this be useful as hack?

This would only be useful if you can use it while moving...

Please correct me if I'm wrong or misunderstanding

@Dbbtop
Copy link
Author

Dbbtop commented Nov 24, 2024

No, this is not an auto hit. This hack sends 2 packets when hitting - start_sprint and stop_sprint, thus, the target entity is pushed back more than with a normal hit without the hack. This works even when the hacker is not moving. This is an abuse of the mechanics of Minecraft

@Axionize
Copy link
Contributor

Axionize commented Nov 24, 2024

That is not what I'm saying. As the debug statement in the code you copy pasted literally says, all this is a packet w-tap cheat.

It's detected by BadPacketsF as soon as this is used during an attack while a player resprints (and they're moving), which happens every so often in actual fights.

If you don't want to get detected (and therefore simply hold w in a fight with this cheat module on) against a player who actually knows what they're doing you will lose.

The point I was trying to make is because of the reasons I have explained above this is a very low priority "bypass." This can definitely be better detected through heuristics but obviously Grim 2.0 has none of them unlike Grim Premium/3.0 because the moment you make such a check open source it becomes worthless.

We may however be able to design a better logic check for this.

@MitroxYT
Copy link

This may not be the right approach but
many cheats can be fixed
by checking for a gap between packages and
this will fix many cheats like
Autotem
Autoswap
Chest stealer
Translated by DeepL
.

@Axionize
Copy link
Contributor

"Gap between packages?"
???

@ManInMyVan
Copy link
Contributor

ManInMyVan commented Nov 24, 2024

"Gap between packages?"
???

delay between packets

@Axionize
Copy link
Contributor

Axionize commented Nov 30, 2024

@SamB440 Can I please copy your Pharus check into here to just completely fix this for now?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants