Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ESPAsyncwebserver - Question #191

Closed
nelsontechnologies opened this issue Apr 2, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

ESPAsyncwebserver - Question #191

nelsontechnologies opened this issue Apr 2, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@nelsontechnologies
Copy link

Is there any advantage to using espasyncwebserver instead? If so, how would you implement it?

Thanks!

@Hieromon
Copy link
Owner

Hieromon commented Apr 3, 2020

Not blocking the ESP module process acting as a server to respond to HTTP requests addresses concurrent processing needs. It brings benefits but requires developer skills.
You can see it in the posted issue of the ESPAsyncWebServer repository. Many people do not understand what "asynchronous" means.
I have developed AyncAutoConnect not implemented AutoConnectAux, but no plan to publish the repository, yet.

@Hieromon Hieromon closed this as completed Apr 3, 2020
@v-c
Copy link

v-c commented Jun 29, 2020

Any chance you will reconsider and publish AsyncAutoConnect?

@Hieromon
Copy link
Owner

@v-c I hope to publish someday but it's still incomplete. In particular, there are few problems with the method of migrating WiFi connection waiting- process from while loop to event-driven.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants