Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

community generation task rethinking #2

Open
v18nguye opened this issue Jul 13, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

community generation task rethinking #2

v18nguye opened this issue Jul 13, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@v18nguye
Copy link

v18nguye commented Jul 13, 2023

Hi authors,

Thank you for your published code!

I have skimmed through the repo. As I am currently interested in the graph generation problem, so I have looked deeper into the Community generation problem. There is an abnormal problem in the code that generates the Community dataset, where a hundred of generated graph samples have the same number of nodes, and the same number of nodes for each generated community given a graph sample. I think that It is not a standard way that researchers benchmark models on this dataset. After fixing this issue by having different number of nodes per community per generated graph, I tested again your model and the results changed significantly, and that does not resemble to the published results.

what I have changed is to put c_sizes in the k loop to have various graph sizes and community sizes.

c_sizes = np.random.choice([5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10], num_communities)

@HyTruongSon
Copy link
Owner

Thank you very much for your feedback! I will take a look into the issue when time allows.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants