-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 56
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
QUESTION : How to apply ptf or group ptf to the REPO SERVER itself #203
Comments
It would be helpful to have more specifics such as seeing the playbook and the roles and modules it is invoking, along with the output that includes the error with using the repo server as the target. Not sure off the top of my head why this would not work, but it could be a current limitation. |
Hi Rob, we test the playbook "fix_repo_download_apply_individual_ptfs" with repo server = target node and it's works except the fact that the SAVF and cover letter has been deleted at the end of load / apply . The problem is that the catalog is updated with the right ptf and information savf location , that mean for next time we will run the playbook it will not work as the ptf is in catalog but the savf not exist |
The lower level call to role "sync_apply_individual_ptfs" that would occur with this playbook is probably using default delete as true, so I am wondering if this is cleaning up the downloaded install image on the repo server when you don't want it to. Typically you want the image cleaned up afterwards on the target nodes because normally it has been copied / sync'ed and no longer needed after load / apply. |
HI Rob, we well understand, but we cannot change roles/modules as we execute playbook on shared tower ansible very secure . So is it possible to increase the level of the parameter variable "sync_apply_individual_ptfs_delete" of role "sync_apply_individual_ptfs" to the role "fix_repo_download_apply_individual_ptfs" with same variable entry (default "true") , |
Sure, my suggestion was to use 2 different playbooks from fix management use case to do the same thing (with control over "delete" option with copied images) as the one playbook from use case that you are using and verify that it works on the repo server. This would just be a workaround to see if that resolves the issue and doesn't involve changing modules or roles. |
Surfacing delete option with 3.2.0. |
Hi team, How to apply ptf or group ptf to the REPO SERVER himself
we use the playbook to load/apply on different targets node from the repo server it's works fine BUT when we want to run it on REPO Server himself , I mean apply ptf or group ptf to the REPO Server it dosen't work as transfert savf (ptf) or bin (group ptf) failed
What is your recommendation ? is there a specific playbook which extract info from report and install ptf to the repo himself ?
Many Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: