Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

softlayer block provider shoud handle errors for pending orders. #10

Open
depohmel opened this issue Oct 29, 2018 · 3 comments
Open

softlayer block provider shoud handle errors for pending orders. #10

depohmel opened this issue Oct 29, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@depohmel
Copy link
Contributor

Recently I got following error for VolumeCreate you may only place one order at a time. Currently, you have a pending order that needs final disposition before you can place another order.
According to IBM support, I should wait until order will be approved and then submit a new one.

If multiple orders will be submitted only one can be approved at a time and the rest will get errors and has to be resubmitted.

@depohmel depohmel changed the title softlayer blokc provider shoud handle erro for pending order. softlayer block provider shoud handle errors for pending orders. Oct 29, 2018
@arahamad-zz
Copy link
Member

@depohmel, it should not be like this looks some restriction for your a/c , just to verify that can you please create storage from softlayer port may be multiple storage at a time. but this seems to be an error from Softlayer

@depohmel
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have spoken with IBM support and this is not my account restriction.
This is a restriction on the cloud provider side.
The restriction is the only 1 Order can be in Pending.
this is the answer form IBM support You can only have one order pending at a time. So you would need to wait for the first order to be approved and then once approved, submit the next order, and same process again.

@arahamad-zz
Copy link
Member

a/c restriction I mean to say IAaS a/c i.e Softlayer a/c which you are using for creating cluster. I think you are talking about Bluemix a/c that is different.

but its not this lib restriction/issue

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants