Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

For discussion: use case for power line frequency field #81

Open
asoskic opened this issue Sep 5, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

For discussion: use case for power line frequency field #81

asoskic opened this issue Sep 5, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@asoskic
Copy link
Collaborator

asoskic commented Sep 5, 2022

Guiomar has proposed that it may make sense to add information about the utility frequency at the place where a study has been conducted. We are wondering whether there may be a scenario where such information is useful and the person needing it cannot extract it either from the paper (participant sample description) or from the data that they are reanalysing (frequency spectrum) - it would be good to add questions that someone may make use of, but it is also important not to burden users with unnecessary questions.

@robertoostenveld
Copy link
Contributor

PowerLineFrequency is documented in BIDS datasets as a required field.

The frequency of the power line is either 50 or 60 Hz, and from information in the paper it might be deduced from the specification where the lab is located (although not trivial in the case of Japan, where 50 and 60 are both used). It is not a piece of information commonly specified in papers, and as reader/reviewer I am not missing it. If there are potential concerns with power-line affecting the interpretation (e.g. when studying gamma-band activity), then that is usually explicitly discussed.

To summarize: I am neutral to this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants