-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 492
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature request: Make some dataset fields autocomplete ? #2603
Comments
@Grimaldum thanks for creating this issue. Since I participated in the chat at http://irclog.iq.harvard.edu/dataverse/2015-09-29 I'd be happy to clarify anything that's unclear. Generally, we should think more about disambiguation of author names using ORCID IDs or similar. Astronomers probably don't want to see keywords suggested from social science datasets (looking at you @augustfly) so any autocomplete on keywords should probably be restricted to subdataverses. |
I would definitely state that autocompletion should be filtered on some sort of relevant contextual information. Pure autocomplete would be a nightmare across domains. |
@rmo-cdsp are you still interested in this? |
Yes indeed, some users on our dataverse asked us if this feature already existed. I think they would be very happy to have such a thing available :) |
It would be very nice to have this feature for TSV-based vocabularies, but also in combination with "Referencing API data in the metadata" (#4772). |
We also are very interested in this for using it with a custom metadata block. See some chatting about this on IRC today. It would be a pleasure to see it like jQuery and similar have it: https://jqueryui.com/autocomplete |
#6030 created! |
I was wondering if some fields (like authors or keywords) could have an autocomplete functionality in the edition view? I think it would be a good addition in order to uniform the names, and not have "multiple" names for the same person (name error, inversion between last and first name, etc). A global (meaning all authors from the root) autocomplete could be considered for the author fields, but maybe not for keywords and only consider the actual dataverse ? I would say yes for keywords, I don't personally see any problem, but who knows ...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: