-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 493
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
As a Researcher, I want to view differentially private metadata so that I can learn enough to determine whether or not it’s worth my time to go through the IRB process for the raw data. #4234
Comments
NOTE: Backend prerequisite, issue #4230 and frontend prerequisite, issue #4233 Here is an outline the proposed UI changes. UI IMPACT Dataset pg/File pg
QUESTIONS
MOCKUPS |
For reference when we get to this issue: In #4233, I recommended the following text change for the "Privacy-Preserving Data Preview" modal seen when a depositor clicks to go to the PSI tool to configure PSI for a file:
At the time we weren't able to implement this change because by that point we'd removed the psi.json file from the Dataverse source code. When the time comes, I'd like this text change implemented. |
Thanks for these edits on the text, @dlmurphy. The language needs to be free of any implied promises. Can you take another round taking out words that imply any sort of guarantee? |
@dlmurphy also, are hyperlinks supported? @matthew-a-dunlap wouldn't know better than I would. |
Good call, @TaniaSchlatter. I've edited the message to be less of a guarantee of success. @pdurbin, I'm not sure whether we can include a hyperlink in this modal. If so, I think it's nice to have, but if we can't include the hyperlink then I'd be comfortable taking it out (it's not essential).
|
@dlmurphy Confirmed Here is the description section of the psi.json (github won't let me upload .json)
|
@matthew-a-dunlap Looking great, thanks! |
Just discussed with @mheppler and we realized there are a few pretty compelling reasons not to include that "differential privacy" link to the Differential Privacy Primer paper in this message modal. Best option for us here is to take out that link, and instead link to our PSI page in the user guide (which will include a link to that paper). We also need to make sure that this link opens in a new tab. So the message should actually be:
This can definitely wait until this issue is prioritized, just leaving it here for the future. |
Closing in favor of #7400 |
Logged in users can use Two Ravens to explore differentially private versions of the metadata for sensitive files.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: