Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RData ingest #6985

Closed
WickM opened this issue Jun 16, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

RData ingest #6985

WickM opened this issue Jun 16, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@WickM
Copy link

WickM commented Jun 16, 2020

RData Import Problem descriped in this threath.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer#!msg/dataverse-community/fktZwaoV4yg/AzWRc0heBQAJ

Tabular data ingest failed. Unknown exception occured during ingest; R Tab File Parser: Could not obtain varQnty from the dataset metadata

@pdurbin
Copy link
Member

pdurbin commented Jun 16, 2020

Developers, note that "dat.RData" can be downloaded from the thread above.

@kuriwaki
Copy link
Member

kuriwaki commented Sep 2, 2020

The dat.RData file given in the thread seems like only like length-one character vector.

image

Unlike dta's/csv's, RData is not guaranteed to be rectangular -- most RData files in the wild aren't. So I'm not sure if it is a good default to try ingesting every RData/Rds file that comes in. See suggestion in #7249 to not ingest at all.

@pdurbin
Copy link
Member

pdurbin commented Oct 1, 2022

@kuriwaki thanks for the analysis. I trust you on what kind of RData file it is. 😄

I think we should close this issue in favor of the one you opened where we should decide just how much we want to support RData for both ingest (this issue) and download:

There's also an even bigger rethink of all of tabular ingest proposed here:

@WickM note that it's possible to skip ingest via API, if you'd like:

Here's a request to be able to skip ingest via UI (a "skip ingest" checkbox)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants