Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JOSS review: typo in paper #572

Closed
kevinrue opened this issue Apr 21, 2021 · 0 comments
Closed

JOSS review: typo in paper #572

kevinrue opened this issue Apr 21, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
documentation 📑 Error/problems with documentation

Comments

@kevinrue
Copy link

kevinrue commented Apr 21, 2021

```{r reporting, echo=FALSE, fig.cap="Comparing the 'Standard' approach of reporting statistical analysis in a publication/report with the 'ggstatsplot' approach of reporting the same analysis next to an informative graphic. Note that the results described in the 'Standard' approach are about the 'Dinosaur' dataset plotted on the right. Without the accompanying visualization, it is hard to evaluate the validity of the results. The ideal reporting practice will be a hybrid of these two approaches where the plot contains both the visual and numerical summaries about a statistical model, while the narrative provides interpretive context for the reported statistics."}

interpretive

should be

interpretative

For openjournals/joss-reviews#3167

@IndrajeetPatil IndrajeetPatil added the documentation 📑 Error/problems with documentation label Apr 21, 2021
@kevinrue kevinrue changed the title typo in paper JOSS review: typo in paper Apr 21, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation 📑 Error/problems with documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants