We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Internal
Describe the feature you'd like We need to add some queries.
New Conway ledger state queries have been requested and already implemented in ledger: IntersectMBO/cardano-ledger#4514
queryProposals
queryRatifyState
Also there is another query that has been implemented that should be added, which works for all eras, not only Conway:
queryFuturePParams
Describe alternatives you've considered
I've considered implementing them myself, but decided to create this ticket instead 😉
Additional context / screenshots Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
GetProposals and GetRatifyState were added in this commit.
GetProposals
GetRatifyState
It seems we still need to add the queryFuturePParams query.
Sorry, something went wrong.
GetFuturePParams
NodeToClientV_18
Closed by #1251
dnadales
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Internal
Describe the feature you'd like
We need to add some queries.
New Conway ledger state queries have been requested and already implemented in ledger: IntersectMBO/cardano-ledger#4514
queryProposals
queryRatifyState
](https://github.com/IntersectMBO/cardano-ledger/blob/411054e40b4e08350049e4eaffdf0cc5f73e9d91/libs/cardano-ledger-api/src/Cardano/Ledger/Api/State/Query.hs#L346C1-L347)Also there is another query that has been implemented that should be added, which works for all eras, not only Conway:
queryFuturePParams
Describe alternatives you've considered
I've considered implementing them myself, but decided to create this ticket instead 😉
Additional context / screenshots
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: