We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
it seems like since https://github.com/JSQLParser/JSqlParser/pull/1274/files#diff-7a533138e54adbf0baac5356d4b7d4a6d192300199ef50eede004f706fd35de3R104 ColumnDefinition accepts ExpressionVisitorAdapter
ColumnDefinition
ExpressionVisitorAdapter
JSqlParser/src/main/java/net/sf/jsqlparser/statement/create/table/ColumnDefinition.java
Lines 104 to 106 in c89cf21
is it possible to have it take one of the interfaces instead?
(just noticed also, they seem to be referencing each other, ExpressionVisitorAdapter#visit calls ColumnDefinition#accept)
ExpressionVisitorAdapter#visit
ColumnDefinition#accept
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Greetings,
this seems to have been cleaned up with revision commit 288b177 in PR #1778 already.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
it seems like since https://github.com/JSQLParser/JSqlParser/pull/1274/files#diff-7a533138e54adbf0baac5356d4b7d4a6d192300199ef50eede004f706fd35de3R104
ColumnDefinition
acceptsExpressionVisitorAdapter
JSqlParser/src/main/java/net/sf/jsqlparser/statement/create/table/ColumnDefinition.java
Lines 104 to 106 in c89cf21
is it possible to have it take one of the interfaces instead?
(just noticed also, they seem to be referencing each other,
ExpressionVisitorAdapter#visit
callsColumnDefinition#accept
)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: