-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Wishes for new fetchers #2581
Comments
By the way, ottobib is worldcat.org based |
Is there currently a need for new fetchers? Since all the issues are closed, it seems like this issue could also be closed |
@r0light This issue is still valid, it was created to have a central list of fetcher wishes and not an issue for each fetcher to keep the better overview |
I developed the option to use ottobib based on the chimbori, then after it try the ebook.de and chimbori.com is made the requisition for ottobib. I'm not sure if the method returns the expected ottobib bibtex. I'm putting here the IsbnViaOttoBibFetcher code.
|
Chimbori was removed, and ottobib was added. Ottobib uses worldcat for searching ISBN |
Looking at the Worldcat fetcher at the moment. The Worldcat API would require an API key, is that something you are able to provide for testing? And how would that be added in the production code? |
I'm working on the APS fetcher. Not sure what your stance is on API keys, but I'll just implement it for the open access papers. |
@GlennOlsson Thank you for your intested.
Note that in the SpringerLink fetcher we did not implement the preference and the environment variable, but only the constant 😇 |
There are now PRs for each fetchers listed above. Thus, I close this issue. Thanks to everybody involved. |
Issue to collect wishes for new fetcher implementations. We should also add a prioritization here.
Fulltext:
Entry-based:
ID-based:
Search-based:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: