Replies: 3 comments
-
ok, as I opened the issue I was not aware that we are actually doing ~4000
does not generate the stack overflow luckily. Still, I would be very interested to hear opinions if the OP is considered a bug or a legitimate limitation (which IMHO should still be documented in the gremlin reference)? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
ok I just found out in the tinkerpop reference, that it is not possible to provide an array / list of values in a Anyhow, this also means that above workaround is not possible and the current implementation definitively is a bug IMHO. Another workaround might be to split the addition of propery values into multiple traversers, sth like this:
Haven't tested if it works, anyhow it is quite unconvenient, and also impossible to know the exact value of x ... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
TinkerPop uses Jira as an issue tracker. You can post your TinkerPop found issues here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TINKERPOP/issues/. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Running this gremlin query inside JRuby:
results in:
For a list of size ~4000.
Not sure if this is a gremlin issue or a JanusGraph issue. Anyway the apache tinkerpop github repo does not have an issue tracker, so I would be very grateful if this is a gremlin issue to get advise where to post the issue.
best
EDIT: Sorry wrong point in source code
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions