-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: reduce work in loop #2026
fix: reduce work in loop #2026
Conversation
Make the case for the void type mutually exclusive with the other check in the loop.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2026 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 80.04% 80.04% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 171 171
Lines 10736 10734 -2
Branches 1030 1030
==========================================
- Hits 8594 8592 -2
Misses 2137 2137
Partials 5 5
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks! Great first PR. 🙂
@all-contributors please add @pjonsson for code.
|
I've put up a pull request to add @pjonsson! 🎉 |
🎉 This is included in version v0.8.3 🎉 The release is available on: Cheers! 📦🚀 |
Adds @pjonsson as a contributor for code. This was requested by JoshuaKGoldberg [in this comment](#2026 (comment)) --------- Co-authored-by: allcontributors[bot] <46447321+allcontributors[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
PR Checklist
status: accepting prs
Overview
Make the case for the void type
mutually exclusive with the other
check in the loop.
Suggested in #2025 (comment).