Reorganization of scitypes in source code

[juliohm]

After #20 is reviewed, can I help reorganizing the types in the source code? I find the scitype section a bit confusing to read. I would like to struct it as a tree of types so that readers can follow the type hierarchy more easily. Also, I could take this opportunity to deprecate some old types like Scientific from the source.

Please let me know if that would be helpful. I plan to work more closely with ScientificTypes.jl moving forward as well.

cc: @ablaom

[ablaom]

Thanks for the offer to help out.

can I help reorganizing the types in the source code?

@OkonSamuel is this likely to cause merge conflict pain with the PR's you are working on?

To be honest, more helpful would be to improve the organization of /test at ScientificTypes, but that's not going to be much fun 😉

[juliohm]

@OkonSamuel please let me know if I can cleanup the house in the main source file. The plan is to just move things around in a first PR, and then reassess the code.

[OkonSamuel]

@OkonSamuel please let me know if I can cleanup the house in the main source file. The plan is to just move things around in a first PR, and then reassess the code.

I'll open a PR this weekend so we can discuss and move things around. Am currently working on improving performance.

[juliohm]

Hi @OkonSamuel , any update on this issue? I am working actively in a project where scientific types will be first-class and would like to contribute to this code more actively. Please let me know when I can start working on a PR.

[OkonSamuel]

Am sorry @juliohm I have been busy lately. You can go ahead and open a PR.