Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
140 lines (121 loc) · 6.31 KB

report.md

File metadata and controls

140 lines (121 loc) · 6.31 KB
Raw

Benchmark Report

Job Properties

Commit(s): JuliaLang/julia@4ba21aa57f57b9e42eeba5886d9dec772281e9f2

Triggered By: link

Tag Predicate: ALL

Daily Job: 2016-10-14 vs 2016-10-13

Results

Note: If Chrome is your browser, I strongly recommend installing the Wide GitHub extension, which makes the result table easier to read.

Below is a table of this job's results, obtained by running the benchmarks found in JuliaCI/BaseBenchmarks.jl. The values listed in the ID column have the structure [parent_group, child_group, ..., key], and can be used to index into the BaseBenchmarks suite to retrieve the corresponding benchmarks.

The percentages accompanying time and memory values in the below table are noise tolerances. The "true" time/memory value for a given benchmark is expected to fall within this percentage of the reported value.

A ratio greater than 1.0 denotes a possible regression (marked with ❌), while a ratio less than 1.0 denotes a possible improvement (marked with ✅). Only significant results - results that indicate possible regressions or improvements - are shown below (thus, an empty table means that all benchmark results remained invariant between builds).

ID time ratio memory ratio
["array","cat",("hcat",5)] 1.48 (15%) ❌ 1.00 (1%)
["array","cat",("hvcat",5)] 1.85 (15%) ❌ 1.00 (1%)
["array","cat",("hvcat_setind",5)] 1.91 (15%) ❌ 1.00 (1%)
["array","cat",("vcat",5)] 1.31 (15%) ❌ 1.00 (1%)
["array","cat",("vcat_setind",5)] 2.03 (15%) ❌ 1.00 (1%)
["array","comprehension",("collect","Array{Float64,1}")] 0.51 (15%) ✅ 1.00 (1%)
["array","comprehension",("collect","FloatRange{Float64}")] 0.84 (15%) ✅ 1.00 (1%)
["array","comprehension",("collect","LinSpace{Float64}")] 0.84 (15%) ✅ 1.00 (1%)
["array","comprehension",("comprehension_collect","Array{Float64,1}")] 0.74 (15%) ✅ 1.00 (1%)
["array","comprehension",("comprehension_collect","FloatRange{Float64}")] 0.84 (15%) ✅ 1.00 (1%)
["array","comprehension",("comprehension_collect","LinSpace{Float64}")] 0.84 (15%) ✅ 1.00 (1%)
["array","index",("sumcolon","100000000:-1:1")] 1.89 (50%) ❌ 1.00 (1%)
["array","index",("sumcolon","1:100000000")] 1.56 (50%) ❌ 1.00 (1%)
["array","index",("sumrange","100000000:-1:1")] 1.51 (50%) ❌ 1.00 (1%)
["array","index",("sumrange","1:100000000")] 1.92 (50%) ❌ 1.00 (1%)
["array","subarray",("lucompletepivCopy!",250)] 0.61 (15%) ✅ 1.00 (1%)
["array","subarray",("lucompletepivSub!",500)] 0.57 (15%) ✅ 1.00 (1%)
["micro","randmatstat"] 1.15 (15%) ❌ 1.00 (1%)
["nullable","nullablearray",("perf_any","NullableArray")] 1.56 (45%) ❌ 1.00 (1%)
["parallel","remotecall",("identity",1024)] 1.00 (15%) 0.96 (1%) ✅
["parallel","remotecall",("identity",2)] 1.02 (15%) 0.94 (1%) ✅
["parallel","remotecall",("identity",4096)] 1.02 (15%) 0.98 (1%) ✅
["parallel","remotecall",("identity",512)] 1.00 (15%) 0.95 (1%) ✅
["parallel","remotecall",("identity",64)] 1.01 (15%) 0.94 (1%) ✅
["problem","laplacian","laplace_iter_vec"] 0.53 (15%) ✅ 1.00 (1%)
["problem","laplacian","laplace_sparse_matvec"] 1.26 (15%) ❌ 1.00 (1%)
["problem","raytrace","raytrace"] 0.85 (15%) ✅ 1.00 (1%)
["sparse","index",("spmat","col","logical",100)] 1.38 (30%) ❌ 1.00 (1%)
["string","join"] 0.59 (40%) ✅ 1.00 (1%)

Benchmark Group List

Here's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:

  • ["array","bool"]
  • ["array","cat"]
  • ["array","comprehension"]
  • ["array","growth"]
  • ["array","index"]
  • ["array","reverse"]
  • ["array","setindex!"]
  • ["array","subarray"]
  • ["io","read"]
  • ["linalg","arithmetic"]
  • ["linalg","blas"]
  • ["linalg","factorization"]
  • ["micro"]
  • ["nullable","basic"]
  • ["nullable","nullablearray"]
  • ["parallel","remotecall"]
  • ["problem","fem"]
  • ["problem","go"]
  • ["problem","grigoriadis khachiyan"]
  • ["problem","imdb"]
  • ["problem","json"]
  • ["problem","laplacian"]
  • ["problem","monte carlo"]
  • ["problem","raytrace"]
  • ["problem","seismic"]
  • ["problem","simplex"]
  • ["problem","spellcheck"]
  • ["problem","stockcorr"]
  • ["problem","ziggurat"]
  • ["scalar","arithmetic"]
  • ["scalar","fastmath"]
  • ["scalar","iteration"]
  • ["scalar","predicate"]
  • ["shootout"]
  • ["simd"]
  • ["sort","insertionsort"]
  • ["sort","issorted"]
  • ["sort","mergesort"]
  • ["sort","quicksort"]
  • ["sparse","index"]
  • ["sparse","transpose"]
  • ["string"]
  • ["tuple","index"]

Version Info

Primary Build

Julia Version 0.6.0-dev.970
Commit 4ba21aa (2016-10-13 23:23 UTC)
Platform Info:
  OS: Linux (x86_64-linux-gnu)
  CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1241 v3 @ 3.50GHz
  WORD_SIZE: 64
           Ubuntu 14.04.4 LTS
  uname: Linux 3.13.0-85-generic #129-Ubuntu SMP Thu Mar 17 20:50:15 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64
Memory: 31.383651733398438 GB (15790.9296875 MB free)
Uptime: 1.2069444e7 sec
Load Avg:  1.0029296875  1.0146484375  0.96533203125
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1241 v3 @ 3.50GHz: 
       speed         user         nice          sys         idle          irq
#1  3501 MHz   18989105 s          0 s    4088850 s  1180434258 s         36 s
#2  3501 MHz   52616400 s          0 s    2580824 s  1150976035 s          5 s
#3  3501 MHz   17947230 s          0 s    2246678 s  1186172453 s         24 s
#4  3501 MHz   15577785 s          0 s    2261991 s  1188508387 s          4 s

  BLAS: libopenblas (USE64BITINT DYNAMIC_ARCH NO_AFFINITY Haswell)
  LAPACK: libopenblas64_
  LIBM: libopenlibm
  LLVM: libLLVM-3.7.1 (ORCJIT, haswell)