Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Should we fall back to serial execution for nchunks=1 and chunksize>length(input)? #72

Open
carstenbauer opened this issue Mar 7, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Should we fall back to serial execution for nchunks=1 and chunksize>length(input)? #72

carstenbauer opened this issue Mar 7, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@carstenbauer
Copy link
Member

In both cases, we end up with a single chunk and already now run effectively serially. However, the difference to SerialScheduler is that we

  • run a different code path and thus
  • still create and spawn a (single) task which might run on a non-main thread.
@carstenbauer carstenbauer added the question Further information is requested label Mar 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@carstenbauer