-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 234
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enzyme: add make_zero of cuarrays #2600
Conversation
[only downstream]
Enzyme CI fails. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2600 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 73.51% 9.27% -64.25%
==========================================
Files 157 157
Lines 15207 15025 -182
==========================================
- Hits 11180 1394 -9786
- Misses 4027 13631 +9604 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
@maleadt okay fixed! |
Still fails. Please have a look at the CI logs. |
oh apologies, I just saw the green and assumed it was fine |
5d585c4
to
c850163
Compare
The last build failed to even precompile the extension:
A rebase won't fix this, so cancelling the outstanding builds. @wsmoses Please verify locally things work first. |
Fixed/verified locally Test Summary: | Pass Broken Total Time
Overall | 27434 11 27445
SUCCESS
Testing CUDA tests passed
(CUDA) pkg> ^C
julia> |
Testing now exceeds the 30min limit. |
trying it with an hour to see if it's fine |
however, it looks like this was already happening previously, so not due to this PR presumably: https://buildkite.com/julialang/cuda-dot-jl/builds/5616#0193de0a-806e-4e36-af34-2abfe9fa437d |
Testing still fails
|
@@ -246,8 +246,7 @@ steps: | |||
build.message !~ /\[only/ && !build.pull_request.draft && | |||
build.message !~ /\[skip tests\]/ && | |||
build.message !~ /\[skip downstream\]/ | |||
timeout_in_minutes: 30 | |||
soft_fail: true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is wrong: 6bdb146
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah okay will fix, but also I’m now confused from a high level. There an obvious undef var usage in the patch (which I will fix), which breaks CI but I never hit locally just running test.
is this not run as part of the default tests?
@maleadt okay all properly passes now (and runs in 31mins it seems) |
[only downstream]