-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rename linear manifold to Euclidean? #222
Comments
I was also confused about what |
I would be fine with either Planar or Euclidean, but I feel like Planar is a bit more descriptive about what is actually going on? |
I guess those methods will always be 2d? |
Most likely, if we go into 3d we can always soft-deprecate Planar for Euclidean |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I'm not a mathematician and a little out of my depth here, but the name
Linear
seems unintuitive to me for calculations in Euclidean space. Why don't we call itEuclidean
? Linear sounds kind of 1D. If we want to specify that it is 2D space we could call itPlanar
, but I don't think that we do?GeometryOps.jl/GeometryOpsCore/src/types.jl
Lines 38 to 45 in 737340f
Manifolds.jl also calls their manifold in euclidean space
Euclidean
: https://juliamanifolds.github.io/Manifolds.jl/latest/manifolds/euclidean.htmlThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: