Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 22, 2024. It is now read-only.

Commit

Permalink
release
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
tknopp authored Jan 17, 2022
1 parent fad5bdb commit 426bfc9
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion Project.toml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
name = "Gtk"
uuid = "4c0ca9eb-093a-5379-98c5-f87ac0bbbf44"
version = "1.1.11"
version = "1.1.12"

[deps]
Cairo = "159f3aea-2a34-519c-b102-8c37f9878175"
Expand Down

6 comments on commit 426bfc9

@tknopp
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@tknopp tknopp commented on 426bfc9 Jan 17, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@JuliaRegistrator
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Registration pull request created: JuliaRegistries/General/52605

After the above pull request is merged, it is recommended that a tag is created on this repository for the registered package version.

This will be done automatically if the Julia TagBot GitHub Action is installed, or can be done manually through the github interface, or via:

git tag -a v1.1.12 -m "<description of version>" 426bfc95e0ad40d1ce9368d4fe861cb31dc98b01
git push origin v1.1.12

@tknopp
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@tknopp tknopp commented on 426bfc9 Jan 17, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@giordano: It complaints about JLLWrappers combat entry missing: Can you give me the version number we should depend on?

@giordano
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Latest version is 1.4.0, that should be fine

@IanButterworth
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Given that #613 adds a function to the API, perhaps this should be a non-breaking change instead of a patch?

I also thought #607 warranted a non-breaking change but was released in a patch?

@IanButterworth
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

By "non-breaking change" I mean v1.2.0

Please sign in to comment.