Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pkg3: TOML Compatibility #35

Open
GravityAssisted opened this issue May 19, 2017 · 4 comments
Open

Pkg3: TOML Compatibility #35

GravityAssisted opened this issue May 19, 2017 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@GravityAssisted
Copy link

Hi,

I saw that you are using TOML.

So Are you using TOML.jl package ? It seems that package is not maintained and doesn't support TOML V>0.2.

thanks

@GravityAssisted GravityAssisted changed the title TOML Compatibility Pkg3: TOML Compatibility May 19, 2017
@StefanKarpinski
Copy link
Sponsor Member

No, it's using a different, unregistered, TOML implementation that's linked to in the Julep. It will be kept up-to-date and will support whatever the current TOML spec is. We may have to take back the TOML.jl package name. Currently @wildart's TOML package is a bit unmaintained and @wildart himself is M.I.A., but if necessary, we can fork it and make the fork the official version.

@ararslan ararslan added the Pkg3 label May 19, 2017
@GravityAssisted
Copy link
Author

GravityAssisted commented May 19, 2017

@StefanKarpinski Thanks, this is exciting.
I am actually planing to use TOML as an input file parser in a tool we are developing here, in Julia. The input file has to be human readable but simple. So TOML looks like a great option.
I was wondering how soon are you planning to replace the TOML.jl with your version ? or is it possible for us to to use your TOML now ?

@ararslan
Copy link
Member

@GravityAssisted You can use the unregistered TOML parsing package by doing

Pkg.clone("https://github.com/wildart/TOML.jl.git")

But the usual cautions apply to using any package on its master branch: breaking changes could happen at any time, things might not work at any given time, etc. etc.

@GravityAssisted
Copy link
Author

GravityAssisted commented May 20, 2017

@ararslan Thanks I tried using it. Looks like it works fine for most of the cases, except "offset". See issue here

this is okay, as I wont be using this feature I think.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants