Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stop testing on nightly #1861

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Stop testing on nightly #1861

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

andreasnoack
Copy link
Member

There are so many failures that it makes the CI status useless. We should trigger CI upcoming Julia releases in dedicated PRs instead of unconditionally testing on nightly.

There are so many failures that it makes the CI status useless. We should trigger CI upcoming Julia releases in dedicated PRs instead of unconditionally testing on nightly.
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.90%. Comparing base (13029c0) to head (df17fbb).
Report is 7 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1861      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.99%   85.90%   -0.09%     
==========================================
  Files         144      144              
  Lines        8666     8655      -11     
==========================================
- Hits         7452     7435      -17     
- Misses       1214     1220       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@devmotion devmotion left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree, nightly seems too noisy. An alternative we could consider would be to test against the latest tagged version by running one test with

version: '1'
include-all-prereleases: true

(see https://github.com/julia-actions/setup-julia?tab=readme-ov-file#prereleases).

andreasnoack and others added 2 commits May 27, 2024 20:26
* Increase sample size when testing empirical moments of DiscreteNonParametric

* Use StableRNGs for semicircle.jl to avoid breakage on 1.11-beta

* Run CI on all PRs. Also CI for workflow_dispatch and merge_group

* Update semicircle.jl

Co-authored-by: David Widmann <devmotion@users.noreply.github.com>

* Update locationscale.jl

Co-authored-by: David Widmann <devmotion@users.noreply.github.com>

* Update locationscale.jl

Co-authored-by: David Widmann <devmotion@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: David Widmann <devmotion@users.noreply.github.com>
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ jobs:
- uses: julia-actions/setup-julia@v2
with:
version: ${{ matrix.version }}
include-all-prereleases: true
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems this implies that currently only the prerelease is tested but no stable release anymore...

@devmotion
Copy link
Member

I think this PR can be closed since the problem was already fixed by #1863 and #1888.

@devmotion devmotion closed this Sep 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants