-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 79
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FR: Package as Docker image #96
Comments
Hello man! Adding this feature could be a great thing. But I don't have the time/knowledge to maintain it efficiently. If you are willing to do it, you can be the main referee regarding this feature (like a distro packager) PR are appreciated :) Have a great day!! |
Great to know! Thanks for considering. For completeness, these are the tasks need here:
What will be needed later (in case you want to have it ready beforehand) is for you to have a Docker Hub account ready (it's free). You might want to grab it now, to ensure you have the desired username and prevent others from taking it before. Other than that, no urgency for now. |
Hello, I'm available to implement this feature! Regarding the Docker Hub account setup, I can start by creating a GitHub workflow that is initially disabled. Once @Julien-cpsn sets up the Docker Hub account, they can re-enable it, and the workflow will be good to go. Does that sound okay? |
Hello, Yes, go with that! If you want to speak more in depth about it, come to the app discord :) Have a great day |
Hi there. I've just learnt about ATAC and found it awesome! Thanks for sharing.
Aside from using it myself, I'm thinking of easy ways to bundle ATAC as another tool in software development stacks.
For instance, on a
Makefile
-controlled stack in any repo, you could easily add just a simpledocker run
one-liner to allow users to start ATAC with a local JSON/YAML without requiring them even installing.Also, projects could just distribute their own custom Docker images with their API definitions baked in, just creating a
Dockerfile
which would use ATAC's public image as base.No need to mention that you could run ATAC by just issuing a
docker run
command, no install needed.If maintaining an official public image sounds too much work, an alternative could be just hosting a
Dockerfile
in the repo which in turn would allow a ad-hoc image build with a simpledocker build
from the repo's URL.Would this be an acceptable feature/PR?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: