Grading Criteria of the KTH Devops Course

we are all aware that assessment may be subjective in nature. In case of disagreement, the informed judgment of the Professor is the final decision.
in the grading criteria presented below, the mandatory parts do not count as "yes" for grading.
Presentation and demos are mandatory.
In case of a task failure, the students receive instructions for repetition through Canvas

Presentations

The concept: The students prepare a 7 minute presentation on a topic that is relevant to DevOps. All students in a presentation must be present and speak in a balanced manner.

	Yes	No
timing: The presentation's length is between 6:30-7:30 minutes (hard limit)	Yes	No
structure: The presentation is well-structured, the structure announced and graphically visible	Yes	No
introduction: The presentation contains a good, motivating introduction telling why this presentation is important	Yes	No
content: The presentation contains one part that is deeply technical, with readable code snippets	Yes	No
originality: The presentation contains one part that is original (less than 1000 google results)	Yes	No
reflection: The presentation contains a reflective part	Yes	No
conclusion: The last slide contains a good and concise take-home message	Yes	No
understanding: The speakers demonstrate a clear understanding of the topic and can effectively respond to questions from the audience.	Yes	No
delivery: The speakers talk loudly and clearly, engage with the audience and have humour	Yes	No
slides: The slides don't have too much text and contain nice illustrations	Yes	No

To pass, you must have at least 8 "yes".

Scientific paper

The concept: The students prepare a 7 minute presentation on one scientific paper related to DevOps. The paper must have been published in 2021 onwards. We recommend to consider papers in software engineering venues, but we welcome any proposal.

	Yes	No
timing: The presentation's length is between 6:30-7:30 minutes (hard limit)	Yes	No
structure: The presentation is well-structured, the structure announced and graphically visible	Yes	No
introduction: The presentation contains a good, motivating introduction telling why the paper is important	Yes	No
content: The presentation contains one part that is deeply technical, with readable code snippets	Yes	No
critical: The presentation contains a critical part	Yes	No
related-work: The presentation discusses two more related papers which are not in the bibliography	Yes	No
conclusion: The last slide contains a good and concise take-home message	Yes	No
understanding: The speakers demonstrate a clear understanding of the paper's content and can effectively respond to questions from the audience.
delivery: The speakers talk loudly and clearly, engage with the audience and have humour	Yes	No
slides: The slides don't have too much text and contain nice illustrations	Yes	No

To pass, you must have at least 8 "yes".

Demos

The concept: Students prepare a demonstration involving DevOps technology, to be performed during the lecture. For example, a demo typically involves multiple virtual machines, likely deployed in the cloud. A demonstration is scripted, prepared and lasts 6:30-7:30 minutes.

	Yes	No
timing: The demo lasts between 6:30-7:30 minutes (hard limit)	Mandatory	-
relevant: The demonstration is clearly motivated (why it matters for Devops?)	Yes	No
narrative: The demo contains a good narrative	Yes	No
difficulty: The demonstration is difficult to do	Yes	No
speech: The demo is accompanied by a clearly and structured speech	Yes	no
originality: The demonstration is original (there are few demos/tutos on this topic on the Internet)	Yes	No
aesthetics: The demo is visually appealing	Yes	No
engagement: The speakers engage with the audience, possibly with an easter egg	Yes	No
liveness: The speakers update some code / config live	Yes	No
take-home: The demo includes a clear and visible take-home message	Yes	No

To pass, you must have at least 8 "yes".

Open-source contributions

The concept: you contribute to one open-source project related to DevOps. Yout get at least one merged pull-request.

Criteria for the selection of the open-source project: 1) The project is related to DevOps 2) The project has more than 100 Commits 3) The project has an active community on GitHub.

	Yes	No
declaration of intention: The intention to contribute is declared in the project's preferred method (e.g., issue, mailing list).	Yes	No
work-in-progress (WIP): The contribution is marked as WIP until it is ready for review.	Yes	No
ready for review: The contribution is marked as ready and announced for review when it is complete.	Yes	No
conversation: The contributor engages in conversation with the project maintainers, responding to feedback in a timely manner and making necessary changes.	Yes	No
documentation: The contribution includes necessary documentation updates.	Yes	No
testing: The contribution includes necessary testing.	Yes	No
code quality: The code contributed is of high quality, following the project's coding standards and guidelines.	Yes	No
relevance: The contribution is relevant to the project's roadmap and adds value to the project.	Yes	No
difficulty: The contribution is a difficult piece of engineering, either a bug fix or a new feature (mandatory)	Yes	No
merge: The contribution is merged in the main branch of the target project.	Yes	No

To pass, you must have at least 8 "yes".

Executable Tutorials

The concept: you create an executable tutorial about a specific technology related to Devops. You deliver your tutorial on an online platform supporting execution, such as KillerKoda, mybinder.org, collab or equivalent.

	Yes	No
no-account: The tutorial does not require to open complex or paying accounts for the grader. Secrets can be shared with the course GPG key	Mandatory	-
executable: The tutorial can be automatically executed from beginning to the end in the browser	Mandatory	-
ilo: The tutorial states the intended learning outcomes.	Mandatory	-
motivation: The tutorial is clearly motivated (why it matters for Devops?)	Yes	No
background: The tutorial gives enough background	Yes	No
illustrated: The tutorial is illustrated with some informative figures (eg flowchart)	Yes	No
pedagogical: The tutorial is easy to follow	Yes	No
original: The tutorial is original, no or few similar tutorials exist on the web	Yes	No
easter-eggs: The tutorial contains an easter egg	Yes	No
language: The language is appropriate (structure, grammar, spelling)	Yes	No

To pass, you must have at least 8 "yes".

Feedback

The concept: you provide constructive and timely feeback about any task except "feedback". The feedback is provided in a written manner as a well-structured comment on the PR of the task.

	Yes	No
substance: the feedback is substantiated (at least 500 words)	Mandatory	-
generative AI: the feeback contains "I/We certify that generative AI, incl. ChatGPT, has not been used to write this feedback. Using generative AI without permission is considered academic misconduct."	Mandatory	-
timeliness: the feedback is provided 2 business days (48h) after the "go" from the authors	Yes	No
positive: the feedback starts with a list of high-level strengths and positive comments	Yes	No
high-level: the feedback points to clear high-level weaknesses about the work	Yes	No
constructive: all feedback points are constructive and clearly actionable	Yes	No
structure: the feedback is well-structured (eg. along the outline of the work under feedback)	Yes	No
pointers: the feedback contains valuable pointers to additional material	Yes	No
respectful: the feedback is delivered in a respectful and professional manner	Yes	No
humor: the feedback is delivered with a touch of humor, making it more engaging and easier to receive	Yes	No

To pass, you must have at least 8 "yes".