Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What is the main point of shape-radiance ambiguity #32

Open
yjhong89 opened this issue Oct 24, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

What is the main point of shape-radiance ambiguity #32

yjhong89 opened this issue Oct 24, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@yjhong89
Copy link

Dear author,

While I read your nerf++ paper, I coudn't fully understand shape-radiance ambiguity (Section 3 of nerf++ paper).

  1. Is the purpose of Figure 2 experiment illustrating the ambiguity to show that NERF model can fit to arbitrary 3d shape setting of training data ?
    And if it were correct (verified by Figure 2 experiment), how this fact is related to the Factor 1 ("c" must become a high-frequency function as "sigma" deviates from the correct shape) ?

  2. Why the Factor 2 (NERF MLP structure implicitly regularize to make "c" have smooth BRDF prior w.r.d. "d") helps NERF to avoid the shape-radiance ambiguity ?

  3. How the Factor 1 and 2 is logically related ? It seems unrelated since the Factor 1 argues NERF MLP has a limited capacity to model high complexity given incorrect shape, and the Factor 2 argues NERF MLP model implictly regularize to make "c" smooth w.r.d "d" at any given "x"

Thanks you.

Best regards,
YJHong.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant