Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(tokens): add border-radius-round token #30

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 29, 2023

Conversation

portikM
Copy link
Member

@portikM portikM commented Jun 29, 2023

Summary

Adds border-radius-round token

PR Checklist

  • Tests pass: check the output of all package unit and/or component tests.
    • If this PR is the result of a bug, test coverage was added accordingly.
  • Conventional Commits all commits follow the conventional commit standards outlined in the main README.
  • Docs: includes a technically accurate README, and the docs have been updated accordingly based on the changes in this PR.

@portikM portikM requested a review from adamdehaven as a code owner June 29, 2023 21:24
@portikM portikM self-assigned this Jun 29, 2023
@portikM portikM requested a review from jillztom as a code owner June 29, 2023 21:24
Co-authored-by: Adam DeHaven <2229946+adamdehaven@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Member

@adamdehaven adamdehaven left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@portikM portikM merged commit 17c80c6 into main Jun 29, 2023
@portikM portikM deleted the feat/add-border-radius-rounded-token branch June 29, 2023 21:59
kongponents-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2023
# [1.2.0](v1.1.5...v1.2.0) (2023-06-29)

### Features

* **tokens:** add border-radius-round token ([#30](#30)) ([17c80c6](17c80c6))
@kongponents-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.2.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants