-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(entities-*): persist fetcher cache key within session #1820
Conversation
const preferencesStorageKey = 'kong-ui-entities-ca-certificates-list' | ||
const cacheId = computed(() => props.cacheIdentifier || preferencesStorageKey) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
issue: I'm not sure the fallback here makes sense. I understand it will work; however, there's no documentation or expectation that the table's cache identifier will fallback to the table preferences storage key.
If anyone upstream was utilizing one or the other to save data in localStorage or the session, etc., this would be unexpected and could cause conflicting values to override each other in the upstream implementation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe the cacheId isn't used for local storage, it's used for as SWRV cache key so there shouldn't be any clashes unless the preferences storage key was used as a swrv cache key somewhere.
Either way, we can mitigate this risk by adding some static string like:
const cacheId = computed(() => `${props.cacheIdentifier || preferencesStorageKey}-cache-identifier`)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe the cacheId isn't used for local storage
It's not currently that we know of, but it could be
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added this because in <EntityBaseTable>
, we have the following logic:
Lines 260 to 263 in c550fc8
const cacheId = computed((): string => { | |
// Utilize the cacheIdentifier if provided; otherwise, fallback to the preferencesStorageKey that should always be defined | |
return props.cacheIdentifier || props.preferencesStorageKey | |
}) |
I thought we should apply similar logic to ensure a consistent fetcher cache key. However, if this isn't necessary, I believe we can simply remove the fallback.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To add further context: In <EntityBaseTable>
, the props.cacheIdentifier || props.preferencesStorageKey
is already used as both the cacheIdentifier
for <KTableData>
and the key for table preferences in localStorage
. Even if users do not provide a cacheIdentifier
for the entity lists, the fetcher results are stored using fallback keys derived from preferencesStorageKey
. Therefore, the intention here is to generate keys for persistent fetcherCacheKey
containers here using the same logic.
Before this change: Even when cacheIdentifier
is not provided, caching still occurs, and its behavior is essentially consistent with when it is provided.
After: If cacheIdentifier
is not passed, the fetcherCacheKey
cannot be persisted, leading to inconsistent behavior compared to when it is provided. That said, this inconsistency only reflects the behavior prior to optimization, so the impact may not be significant. And indeed, I also think the current approach reveals a bit of abstraction leakage for <EntityBaseTable>
. So I think I'd just remove the fallback.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't functionally test, but other than the comments here, the rest lgtm.
It would be nice if we can get someone more familiar with the area to test
packages/entities/entities-shared/src/composables/useFetcher.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Functionally tested in https://github.com/Kong/konnect-ui-apps/pull/5017 and LGTM.
Summary
KM-747
Before:
cache-key.mp4
After:
persistent-cache-key.mp4
Issue:
This PR addresses an issue where a flash of outdated list data appears when navigating away from and back to a list page after changes are made to the entity list. This happens because the
fetcher-cache-key
is reset every time the list page reloads.To fix this, the PR introduces a global map to track fetcher cache keys by
cacheIdentifier
within the same session. This ensures the fetcher cache remains consistent, reducing flickers of stale data while still allowing revalidation to update the list seamlessly.I also added a default
row-key
to<EntityBaseTable>
to minimize subtle flickering during revalidation.Before:
no-key.mp4
After:
key-id.mp4