-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 623
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cbor: check inline value classes if marked as @ByteString (fixes #2187) #2466
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ internal open class CborWriter(private val cbor: Cbor, protected val encoder: Cb | |
if (encodeByteArrayAsByteString && serializer.descriptor == ByteArraySerializer().descriptor) { | ||
encoder.encodeByteString(value as ByteArray) | ||
} else { | ||
encodeByteArrayAsByteString = encodeByteArrayAsByteString || serializer.descriptor.isInlineByteString() | ||
|
||
super.encodeSerializableValue(serializer, value) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
@@ -278,6 +280,7 @@ internal open class CborReader(private val cbor: Cbor, protected val decoder: Cb | |
@Suppress("UNCHECKED_CAST") | ||
decoder.nextByteString() as T | ||
} else { | ||
decodeByteArrayAsByteString = decodeByteArrayAsByteString || deserializer.descriptor.isInlineByteString() | ||
super.decodeSerializableValue(deserializer) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
@@ -636,6 +639,11 @@ private fun SerialDescriptor.isByteString(index: Int): Boolean { | |
return getElementAnnotations(index).find { it is ByteString } != null | ||
} | ||
|
||
private fun SerialDescriptor.isInlineByteString(): Boolean { | ||
// inline item classes should only have 1 item | ||
return isInline && isByteString(0) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yes, this is a correct way to do it |
||
} | ||
|
||
|
||
private val normalizeBaseBits = SINGLE_PRECISION_NORMALIZE_BASE.toBits() | ||
|
||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks a bit suspicious. If the current descriptor is not a ByteArraySerializer().descriptor and not a value class over
@ByteString ByteArray
, why we should still try to decode it as ByteArray?If this is to support cases when value class property is not annotated itself, like this:
Then I don't see tests for it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh good point, yes that was the intended outcome! I'm not sure if that is wanted, but I can see how it might be unwanted? I guess I could probably expose it as an option in the serializer?
I will add the tests anyhow :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tests added
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm also unsure because I didn't see any requests for that. At the first look, it sounds reasonable, but I do not use byte strings that often