Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pr from fork/137 #254

Closed
wants to merge 220 commits into from
Closed

Pr from fork/137 #254

wants to merge 220 commits into from

Conversation

rhornung67
Copy link
Member

Pull Caliper PR from forked repo into RAJAPerf repo

  • This PR adds support for Caliper timing/data gathering.
  • It still needs some work to avoid relying on specific cloned caliper repo and other tools

Original PR is #137 Please refer to original PR discussion there, but review and approve this one for merging.

jonesholger and others added 30 commits March 12, 2021 14:25
…umented; needs CALI_CONFIG env variable for output
…ll bring in Caliper native reader and adiak, removing our reliance on caliper.py
It can now take strings with spaces as executables.
This allows you to treat things like "srun -n8 ./bin/raja_perf.exe"
as an executable.
src/common/KernelBase.hpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/common/RunParams.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/common/RunParams.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/common/RunParams.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/common/RunParams.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/common/RunParams.hpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/common/RunParams.hpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
constexpr static const char* adiak_systype_build = "@RAJAPERF_BUILD_SYSTYPE@";
constexpr static const char* adiak_machine_build = "@RAJAPERF_BUILD_HOST@";
#endif

#if 0
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe this '#if 0' section can be removed if the new code works

@rhornung67
Copy link
Member Author

@jonesholger I pushed several changes that addressed a good chunk of my review comments and resolved those conversations. A few open items remain.

@jonesholger
Copy link
Contributor

@rhornung67 Thank you for the changes. I think we're very close now.

@rhornung67
Copy link
Member Author

Sounds good. I think Adrien wants to get this merged. Send a ping when it's ready.

…g from doc and referring to file with function, or note indicating dependency version
@jonesholger
Copy link
Contributor

@rhornung67 @MrBurmark @adrienbernede Should be good to go. I think next on the Agenda is a couple of walk throughs of the tutorial and another meeting with stakeholders @pearce8 @slabasan. WRT tutorial I'll move it from WIP to review. There are some hard commit hashes that will need to be revised in tutorial git checkouts, when this branch is merged and again at a release juncture.

@adrienbernede adrienbernede mentioned this pull request Jun 22, 2023
@adrienbernede
Copy link
Member

@rhornung67 We should close this, right ?

@rhornung67 rhornung67 closed this Nov 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants