You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The problem seams to be most common, at high resolutions:
set magn to 800
set Q to 1/192
The points are tiny, and it is difficult to 'grab' one. Quite often a new point will appear instead.
If the points were bigger, i believe this issue would be solved
Deleting one point often removes more than one
Redo works perfect! 👍
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The points are tiny, and it is difficult to 'grab' one. Quite often a new point will appear instead.
If the points were bigger, i believe this issue would be solved
It's not the size of the points but the quantization level versus the zoom level. If there is a control point within the distance for the quantization the point will snap to the same level as the cursor and then you can drag it. I'm touching up the code so it'll be much smoother.
@zonkmachine great 👍 -But should the points be that tiny? I would prefer the medium-big points, for easy mouse-grabbing. Same size in all magnifications. Imo no need to scale points
rc4 win 32
Irradiate/ random in occurrence
recreate:
The problem seams to be most common, at high resolutions:
The points are tiny, and it is difficult to 'grab' one. Quite often a new point will appear instead.
If the points were bigger, i believe this issue would be solved
Deleting one point often removes more than one
Redo works perfect! 👍
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: