Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge PRs targeting stable-1.2 right before the release? #4989

Closed
JohannesLorenz opened this issue May 22, 2019 · 7 comments
Closed

Merge PRs targeting stable-1.2 right before the release? #4989

JohannesLorenz opened this issue May 22, 2019 · 7 comments
Milestone

Comments

@JohannesLorenz
Copy link
Contributor

As the 1.2.0 release seems close, I wonder if we can merge branches of medium or large size targeting stable-1.2. In my case, it was #4976 . The review was successful, but it's one of those fixes that could have side-effects.

If we merge now, there may not be enough time to test before the 1.2.0 release. If we wait, it will go into 1.2.1, right? What would be appropriate?

@BaraMGB
Copy link
Contributor

BaraMGB commented May 22, 2019

In my opinion we should merge the fix and fix the side effects in 1.2.1. 😉

@tresf
Copy link
Member

tresf commented May 23, 2019

#4976 is an enhancement to current functionality and shouldn't have been targeted against stable-1.2 in the first place. That said, if you guys are willing to take on the risk, merge it before release. 👍

@Spekular
Copy link
Member

Spekular commented May 25, 2019

At this point I think it's worth postponing even fixes, assuming they're not fixing severe regressions. We do have a known bugs section in the release notes.

If #4980 is fixed and no worse bugs are found in the meanwhile, I think it's time to release.
If #4980 isn't fixed by June 16th (a month since the issue was opened)... release anyway?

@Spekular
Copy link
Member

Update: #4980 is fixed for 1.2, and no worse bugs have been found in the meantime.

@JohannesLorenz
Copy link
Contributor Author

We might want to wait for #4996

@JohannesLorenz
Copy link
Contributor Author

#4996 is now also solved

@JohannesLorenz
Copy link
Contributor Author

As we are about to release, I'm closing this thread. Feel free to reopen.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants