Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Retire IRC channel? #69

Open
vweevers opened this issue May 26, 2019 · 5 comments
Open

Retire IRC channel? #69

vweevers opened this issue May 26, 2019 · 5 comments
Labels
discussion Discussion

Comments

@vweevers
Copy link
Member

It's been dead for a long time. It was used for the Google discussion recently, which made the channel seem active, and made me sign up for IRCCloud, but now it seems I'm the only one left. Though I don't mind dedicating time to it, questions and discussions would benefit from having multiple participants (both Level members and users).

@Level/core What do you say about retiring the channel? Or at the very least, update our documentation to point to GitHub, clarifying that it's totally cool to open support requests here?

@vweevers vweevers added the discussion Discussion label May 26, 2019
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 26, 2019

I popped into the IRC channel today after spending the weekend re-writing some code to use levelup. The docs are pretty clear but I have a lot of questions about using embedded key value stores in anger, so I'll sign up to wherever.

@vweevers
Copy link
Member Author

To clarify: I do not want to start using Discord or Slack or any other secondary platform. GitHub all the way.

@ralphtheninja
Copy link
Member

I don't mind retiring it.

@rvagg
Copy link
Member

rvagg commented May 27, 2019

👍

@juliangruber
Copy link
Member

I'm also in favor, it's hard to ensure a frustration-free experience

@vweevers vweevers added this to Level Dec 4, 2021
@vweevers vweevers moved this to Backlog in Level Dec 4, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussion Discussion
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants