Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support all relaxed versions of "inProcessServeName" property name #369

Closed
Sarrruman opened this issue Jul 27, 2023 · 0 comments
Closed

Support all relaxed versions of "inProcessServeName" property name #369

Sarrruman opened this issue Jul 27, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Auto-generates notes
Milestone
5.1.4

Comments

@Sarrruman
Copy link
Contributor

The GRPC Autoconfiguration which creates an in-process server depends on the "inProcessServeName" property, but it currently only accepts the exact version of its name.

All relaxed versions of the property should be acceptable, including "in-process-server-name," "inProcessServerName," "in_process_server_name," and "IN_PROCESS_SERVER_NAME."
@Sarrruman Sarrruman changed the title Autoconfiguration should work with all relaxed versions of "inProcessServeName" property name Support all relaxed versions of "inProcessServeName" property name Jul 27, 2023
@Sarrruman Sarrruman reopened this Jul 27, 2023
Sarrruman referenced this issue Jul 27, 2023
@Sarrruman
Fixes autoconfiguration to accept standard version of "inProcessServe…
de17cd0 
…rName" property name (#368)

Co-authored-by: nikola.malenic <nikola.malenic@netsetglobal.rs>
@Sarrruman Sarrruman mentioned this issue Jul 27, 2023
Merged
@jvmlet jvmlet added the enhancement Auto-generates notes label Jul 31, 2023
@jvmlet jvmlet added this to the 5.1.4 milestone Jul 31, 2023
@jvmlet jvmlet added bug Auto-generates notes and removed enhancement Auto-generates notes labels Jul 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug Auto-generates notes
Projects
None yet
Milestone
5.1.4
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jvmlet @Sarrruman