Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Table literals aren't properly checked for field injections and missing fields #2802

Open
Calandiel opened this issue Aug 17, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@Calandiel
Copy link

How are you using the lua-language-server?

Visual Studio Code Extension (sumneko.lua)

Which OS are you using?

Linux

What is the issue affecting?

Type Checking

Expected Behaviour

I'd expect tables created in the return statement to check for missing fields, and those created outside of them to check for injected fields.

Actual Behaviour

There are no warnings emitted for the attached code.

Reproduction steps

Code to reproduce the issue:

---@class Tile
---@field name string

local Tile = {}

---@return Tile
function Tile.new()
	---@type Tile
	local d = {
		name = 'abc',
		f = 10 -- No warning when a field is being injected
	}

	return {
		f = 10 -- No warning even though there's a missing field and a field is being injected
	}
end

Note that it won't produce any warnings, regardless of configuration (as far as I can tell).

Additional Notes

No response

Log File

No response

@tomlau10
Copy link
Contributor

The checking of return-type-mismatch for table literal is added recently in #2768. But seems it is too strict so it is disabled by default. You have to enable it by using "type.checkTableShape": true in your .luarc.json or whatever settings file that you used.

But, only half of the problem is solved 😂 . Because it only checks for missing fields but not extra fields


As for the inject field check, there seems to be some similar issues:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants