Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Intensity calculation for MS2 #10

Open
straussmaximilian opened this issue Feb 25, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Intensity calculation for MS2 #10

straussmaximilian opened this issue Feb 25, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@straussmaximilian
Copy link
Member

Hi,
I did some more testing and wanted to investigate some AlphaPept vs MaxQuant results in AlphaViz.
Here I noticed that the intensity values for MS2 fragments are different. More specifically, the peaks don't seem to be that intense. Is this expected? In AlphaPept I use .readPasefMsMs(), so maybe @swillems has a clue where this could be coming from.

For reference, this is the spectrum I see in AlphaViz(one-click installer v.1.07)
Screen Shot 2022-02-25 at 11 17 22 AM
Below the spectrum I get from an AP search:
Screen Shot 2022-02-25 at 11 18 34 AM
The axis description seems to be correct, and the fragment intensities are low.
Screen Shot 2022-02-25 at 11 19 39 AM

On another note: Clicking on Autoscale Screen Shot 2022-02-25 at 1 42 03 PM seems to squeeze the sequence annotation of matched ions.
Screen Shot 2022-02-25 at 11 19 15 AM

Additional Feature Suggestion: Right now I need to click the protein to get to the peptide I want to investigate. Here it would be cool if I could directly look up a sequence w/o knowing the protein.

@swillems
Copy link

The readPasefMsMs returns centroided spectra. I assume AlphaViz shows the actual raw data which is in profile mode. Could you try to zoom in on on of the AlphaViz peaks with a high intensity and check that these indeed have a larger area under the curve which will be summed after centroiding?

@straussmaximilian
Copy link
Member Author

Screen Shot 2022-02-25 at 2 54 30 PM
Screen Shot 2022-02-25 at 2 54 49 PM

It seems indeed this is profile data. However, then I find the current annotation confusing. The Error plot will give an error for a centroided peak, and the color annotation is also for a single peak.
Suggestions: One could plot profile spectra as line plots to avoid confusion. For the color highlighting, one could color all peaks that are within the selected tolerance and not just the closest.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants